WEVER Token Value Calculator
Current EVER Price
The price of native Everscale (EVER) token in USD.
WEVER Holdings
Your amount of Wrapped Everscale (WEVER) tokens.
Token Value Summary
WEVER Amount:
EVER Price:
Equivalent EVER:
Total Value:
WEVER vs. EVER Comparison
| Feature | WEVER (ERC-20) | EVER (Native) |
|---|---|---|
| Chain | Ethereum & BNB Smart Chain | Everscale masterchain |
| Parity Mechanism | 1:1 lock-mint bridge | Native consensus |
| DeFi Compatibility | Full ERC-20 ecosystem | Limited to Everscale DEXs |
| Governance | Yes - Ever DAO voting | Yes - Everscale DAO voting |
| Bridge Risk | Medium - smart-contract security | Low - native |
Quick Takeaways
- WEVER is a 1:1 wrapped version of Everscale’s native EVER token.
- It lives on Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain as an ERC‑20 token.
- Users can swap WEVER on FlatQube, stake it for governance in Ever DAO, or lend it on any DeFi platform that accepts ERC‑20 assets.
- The token’s value stays pegged to EVER through a smart‑contract bridge that locks the original coin.
- Risks include bridge attacks, liquidity shifts, and the health of the underlying Everscale network.
What is Wrapped Everscale (WEVER)?
Wrapped Everscale (WEVER) is a tokenized version of the native Everscale (EVER) cryptocurrency that lives on other blockchains, primarily Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain. The bridge that creates WEVER locks one EVER on the Everscale masterchain and mints one WEVER on the target chain, guaranteeing a 1:1 parity at all times.
The idea is simple: give EVER the ability to move fluidly through the massive DeFi ecosystems built on Ethereum‑compatible networks without losing its economic value.
Why wrap EVER in the first place?
Ever‑X and the Broxus team designed the wrap to solve two problems. First, the Everscale network, despite its high throughput, is still a niche ecosystem. Second, most DeFi protocols-yield farms, lending markets, decentralized exchanges-are written for ERC‑20 tokens.
By creating WEVER, developers enable EVER holders to tap into those protocols instantly. The token can also be used as collateral on platforms that don’t natively support Everscale, expanding the asset’s utility and potentially increasing its market demand.
How does WEVER work under the hood?
The process relies on a decentralized bridge smart contract. When you send EVER to the bridge, the contract locks the coin on the Everscale masterchain and issues an equivalent amount of WEVER on the destination chain. If you later want to retrieve your EVER, you send WEVER back to the bridge, which then burns the wrapped tokens and releases the original EVER.
Because WEVER follows the ERC‑20 standard, it inherits all the tooling that Ethereum developers love: wallet support, gas‑efficient transfers, and compatibility with automated market makers.
On BNB Smart Chain, WEVER behaves the same way but uses the BEP‑20 interface, which is a drop‑in replacement for ERC‑20. This dual‑chain deployment means users can choose the chain with lower fees or higher liquidity for a particular trade.
Where can you actually use WEVER?
Within the Everscale ecosystem, WEVER is the go‑to asset on FlatQube, the network’s primary decentralized exchange. Almost every liquidity pool on FlatQube pairs WEVER with another token, making it the highest‑TVL asset on the platform.
Beyond FlatQube, WEVER can be staked in Ever DAO. Governance is one‑WEVER‑one‑vote, so holders directly shape protocol upgrades, fee structures, and community grants.
Because the token is ERC‑20, you’ll also find WEVER on popular Ethereum DeFi hubs: Uniswap, SushiSwap, Aave, Compound, and Curve. The same applies to BNB Smart Chain where it appears on PancakeSwap and Venus.
How does WEVER stack up against native EVER and other wrapped tokens?
| Feature | WEVER (ERC‑20) | EVER (Native) | Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Chain | Ethereum & BNB Smart Chain | Everscale masterchain | Ethereum |
| Parity Mechanism | 1:1 lock‑mint bridge | Native consensus | 1:1 lock‑mint bridge |
| DeFi Compatibility | Full ERC‑20 ecosystem | Limited to Everscale DEXs | All Ethereum DeFi |
| Governance Role | Yes - Ever DAO voting | Yes - Everscale DAO voting | No native governance |
| Bridge Risk | Medium - relies on smart‑contract security | Low - native | Medium - similar bridge model |
The table shows that WEVER offers the best of both worlds: native governance power and the massive liquidity of Ethereum‑based DeFi. The main trade‑off is the added bridge risk, which is a common concern for any wrapped asset.
Risks and things to watch
1. Bridge attacks: If the lock‑mint contract is compromised, pegged value can break.
2. Liquidity migration: A sudden shift of WEVER liquidity from FlatQube to an external DEX could affect price stability.
3. Network health: Everscale’s consensus algorithm, Soft Majority Fault Tolerance (SMFT), is still relatively new. Any major bug could indirectly impact WEVER’s peg.
4. Regulatory scrutiny: Wrapped assets sometimes attract attention because they blur the line between different chains.
Staying informed about bridge audits, monitoring TVL on FlatQube, and keeping an eye on Everscale’s validator set are good defensive habits.
Getting started with WEVER
- Choose a wallet that supports ERC‑20 and BEP‑20 (Metamask, Trust Wallet, or the official Everscale Wallet).
- Buy EVER on a supported exchange (e.g., KuCoin, HTX) or receive it from another user.
- Visit the official WEVER bridge portal (always verify the URL).
- Connect your wallet, specify the amount of EVER to lock, and confirm the transaction. The bridge will mint the same amount of WEVER on your chosen chain.
- Now you can supply WEVER to FlatQube, vote in Ever DAO, or deposit it into any Ethereum‑compatible DeFi protocol.
Remember to keep a small amount of ETH or BNB in the same wallet for gas fees.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is WEVER really worth the same as EVER?
Yes. The bridge’s smart contract locks each EVER 1:1 and mints an equal WEVER. As long as the contract remains secure, the market price should track EVER closely.
Can I convert WEVER back to EVER?
Definitely. Send your WEVER to the bridge, the contract will burn the tokens and release the original EVER on the Everscale masterchain.
Do I need to pay fees on both chains?
Yes. You’ll pay gas on the source chain to lock EVER and gas on the destination chain to receive WEVER. Planning ahead for low‑fee windows can save you a few dollars.
Is WEVER safe for long‑term holding?
It’s as safe as the bridge contract and the underlying EVER network. Look for third‑party audits, keep your wallet’s private keys secure, and diversify if you’re risk‑averse.
How does WEVER influence governance?
EVER holders who wrap their tokens into WEVER can still vote in Ever DAO. Each WEVER equals one vote, so larger holders have proportionally more influence on proposals.
Sidharth Praveen
July 24, 2025 AT 01:46WEVER looks promising, especially for folks looking to bridge DeFi assets without a steep learning curve.
Jan B.
July 31, 2025 AT 14:20The 1:1 lock‑mint mechanism is clearly explained and the risk profile seems well‑balanced.
Stefano Benny
August 8, 2025 AT 02:53Sure, the ERC‑20 compatibility is nice, but the bridge’s medium risk ⚠️ means you’re basically paying for an extra attack surface. If the smart contract fails, you lose both sides of the peg.
celester Johnson
August 15, 2025 AT 15:26One might argue that the very act of wrapping a native token is a philosophical statement about the fluidity of value across chains, yet the underlying trust assumptions remain unchanged.
Prince Chaudhary
August 23, 2025 AT 04:00Give WEVER a try, and you’ll see how quickly you can tap into both Ethereum’s liquidity pools and Everscale’s fast finality.
John Kinh
August 30, 2025 AT 16:33Looks like another bridge gimmick.
Mark Camden
September 7, 2025 AT 05:06From a regulatory perspective, the 1:1 peg should simplify KYC/AML compliance, but the smart‑contract exposure still warrants a thorough audit before institutional adoption.
Evie View
September 14, 2025 AT 17:40Don’t be fooled-medium bridge risk means you’re basically gambling with your holdings.
Kate Nicholls
September 22, 2025 AT 06:13The governance overlap is interesting, but I suspect the DAO voting power will be skewed toward early adopters who already dominate the native EVER ecosystem.
Carl Robertson
September 29, 2025 AT 18:46Wow, this is a total game‑changer! I mean, who wouldn’t want to hop between Ethereum and BSC with a single token? It’s like the multiverse of crypto finally makes sense.
Rajini N
October 7, 2025 AT 07:20If you’re new to cross‑chain tokens, start by testing a small amount of WEVER on a testnet. This way you can see the bridge process without risking large capital.
Sophie Sturdevant
October 14, 2025 AT 19:53Liquidity mining on WEVER can provide APY boosts, but remember that token incentives may be unsustainable once the initial emission phase ends.
Nathan Blades
October 22, 2025 AT 08:26The cross‑chain compatibility opens doors for novel arbitrage strategies, especially when price discrepancies appear between ERC‑20 DEXs and Everscale pools.
Somesh Nikam
October 29, 2025 AT 20:00Think of WEVER as a bridge‑coach: it guides your assets across chains while keeping them safe, provided you trust the underlying bridge code.
MARLIN RIVERA
November 6, 2025 AT 08:33Honestly, the bridge’s medium risk rating feels like a marketing gloss over serious security concerns. You’ll see the same vulnerabilities in most cross‑chain solutions.
Debby Haime
November 13, 2025 AT 21:06The calculator tool is handy for quick estimations, though it’s best to double‑check prices on reputable aggregators.
emmanuel omari
November 21, 2025 AT 09:40From a national perspective, supporting native blockchain ecosystems is vital; relying on external bridges could undermine our digital sovereignty.
Andy Cox
November 28, 2025 AT 22:13Interesting read, definitely worth keeping an eye on how the bridge usage evolves over the next few months.
Courtney Winq-Microblading
December 6, 2025 AT 10:46Philosophically, WEVER challenges the notion of “native” value by proving that utility can be preserved across divergent consensus mechanisms.
katie littlewood
December 13, 2025 AT 23:20When evaluating WEVER, it’s essential to consider the broader ecosystem dynamics that shape its adoption trajectory, starting with the fundamental premise that a cross‑chain token must retain a reliable peg to be useful; the 1:1 lock‑mint mechanism, while theoretically sound, hinges on the security of the underlying smart contracts, and any exploit could destabilize the entire bridge, leading to a loss of confidence among liquidity providers; moreover, the dual‑chain exposure introduces arbitrage opportunities that, while attractive to traders, may increase volatility and potentially cause slippage for regular users who simply want to move value; the governance model, shared between the EVER and WEVER DAO, also raises questions about voting power distribution, as early adopters could dominate decision‑making, marginalizing newer participants; on the upside, the integration with the extensive ERC‑20 ecosystem unlocks a plethora of DeFi protocols that were previously inaccessible to native EVER holders, effectively broadening the financial toolkit; nonetheless, the bridge’s medium risk rating cannot be ignored-medium risk often translates to a non‑trivial probability of smart‑contract bugs, which have historically resulted in substantial fund losses across the industry; users should therefore employ prudent risk management, such as limiting exposure and conducting thorough audits of the bridge code; finally, community sentiment and developer support will play pivotal roles in sustaining WEVER’s relevance, as active maintenance and timely upgrades are crucial for navigating the rapidly evolving DeFi landscape; in summary, WEVER presents a compelling use case for cross‑chain interoperability, but its success will depend on robust security practices, transparent governance, and proactive community involvement.
Jenae Lawler
December 21, 2025 AT 11:53While the article extols the virtues of WEVER, it curiously omits a rigorous comparative analysis of gas fee implications on Ethereum versus BSC, an oversight that could materially affect the token’s net utility for cost‑sensitive participants.
Chad Fraser
December 29, 2025 AT 00:26Sounds cool-definitely gonna give WEVER a spin in my next DeFi experiment.
Jayne McCann
January 5, 2026 AT 13:00Is the bridge really needed?
Richard Herman
January 13, 2026 AT 00:46Overall, the concept bridges gaps between ecosystems, and with careful assessment, it can become a valuable tool for diversified portfolios.