KyberSwap Elastic Status Checker
Current Status
Inactive (0 pairs)
As of October 2025, the Fantom Elastic instance has no active trading pairs.
Trading Volume (24h)
Not available
Missing from public dashboards due to inactivity.
Active Pairs
0
No trading pairs are currently listed on the platform.
Liquidity Depth
Not available
Liquidity information is not displayed due to platform inactivity.
User Count
Not available
Active user metrics are unavailable.
Platform Security
Audited
Smart contracts have undergone third-party audits (PeckShield, Quantstamp).
Why This Matters
The lack of active pairs indicates that either:
- The liquidity pools are paused or inactive
- The user interface is temporarily offline
- The platform has been deliberately deactivated
Comparison with Active Fantom DEXs
| Aspect | KyberSwap Elastic (Fantom) | SpookySwap | SpiritSwap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity (US$) - Oct 2025 | 0 (inactive) | $250M+ | $180M+ |
| Non-custodial | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Slippage control | Dynamic Elastic fees | Standard constant-product AMM | Standard constant-product AMM |
| Yield-farm options | KNC-based farms | Multiple LP farms | Multiple LP farms |
| Governance | On-chain KNC voting | Community DAO | Community DAO |
| Current status | Inactive | Active | Active |
Recommendation
For active trading, consider alternatives like SpookySwap or SpiritSwap, which offer:
- Deep liquidity pools
- Continuous trading activity
- Strong community support
These platforms are better suited for reliable, everyday trading needs.
How to Verify Contract Status
- Use a block explorer like FtmScan
- Search for "KyberSwap Elastic" contract address
- Check the "Read Contract" tab for pool info
- Verify active liquidity before interacting
Quick Take
- KyberSwap Elastic on Fantom launched in 2022 but shows 0 tokens and 0 pairs as of Oct2025.
- It is a multi‑chain, non‑custodial liquidity aggregator that promises low slippage.
- Core features include yield‑farm integration, on‑chain governance, and permission‑less swaps.
- Current inactivity raises red flags for traders looking for reliable volume.
- Consider alternative Fantom DEXs (SpookySwap, SpiritSwap) if you need active markets.
KyberSwap Elastic (Fantom) is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Fantom blockchain that uses KyberSwap’s Elastic liquidity‑aggregation engine to source the best prices across many pools. Launched in 2022, the protocol is part of the wider KyberSwap ecosystem, which spans Ethereum, Polygon, Binance Smart Chain, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism and, of course, Fantom.
What is KyberSwap Elastic on Fantom?
At its core, KyberSwap Elastic on Fantom lets users swap tokens without giving up custody. The platform never holds your private keys; every trade is executed directly from your wallet via smart contracts. The "Elastic" moniker refers to a dynamic pricing model that adjusts fee tiers based on pool utilization, aiming to keep slippage low even for large orders.
Unlike a single‑pool DEX, Elastic pulls liquidity from multiple sources-KyberSwap’s own pools, third‑party AMMs, and on‑chain order books. The result is an aggregated order book that can offer better rates than swapping on a single platform.
How the Elastic Engine Works
The engine follows three steps:
- Quote aggregation: When you enter a trade, the smart contract queries all known liquidity sources on Fantom.
- Optimal path selection: An on‑chain algorithm evaluates price impact, gas cost, and fee tier to pick the cheapest route.
- Execution: The chosen route is executed in a single transaction, delivering the output token to your wallet.
This design reduces the need for manual route hunting, a common pain point for traders on fragmented DEX ecosystems.
Current Operational Status (Oct2025)
Data from CoinGecko shows that the Fantom Elastic instance currently lists 0 coins and 0 trading pairs. While the broader KyberSwap platform remains active on other chains, the Fantom Elastic front‑end either suffers from a technical outage or has been deliberately paused.
Key indicators missing from public dashboards include:
- 24‑hour trading volume
- Active user count
- Liquidity depth per pair
Without these metrics, it’s hard to gauge market confidence. Traders who need reliable liquidity should verify the platform’s status on‑chain (e.g., checking the contract’s liquidity pools via a block explorer) before committing funds.
Core Features Across All KyberSwap Chains
Even if the Fantom Elastic UI is dormant, its underlying smart contracts retain several noteworthy capabilities:
- Non‑custodial trading - Users retain private‑key control throughout the swap.
- Permission‑less swaps - No KYC, no account creation; anyone with a wallet can trade.
- Yield‑farming integration - Liquidity providers earn rewards from KyberSwap’s native token (KNC) and partner incentives.
- On‑chain governance - KNC holders vote on fee structures, new pool listings, and parameter tweaks.
- Slippage optimization - Dynamic fee tiers lower costs for large trades.
Pros and Cons Compared to Other Fantom DEXs
| Aspect | KyberSwap Elastic (Fantom) | SpookySwap | SpiritSwap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquidity (US$) - Oct2025 | 0 (inactive) | ~250M | ~180M |
| Non‑custodial | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Slippage control | Dynamic Elastic fees | Standard constant‑product AMM | Standard constant‑product AMM |
| Yield‑farm options | KNC‑based farms | Multiple LP farms | Multiple LP farms |
| Governance | On‑chain KNC voting | Community DAO | Community DAO |
| Current status | Inactive (0 pairs) | Active | Active |
From the table it’s clear that while KyberSwap Elastic offers sophisticated fee mechanics, its lack of active markets makes it a risky choice right now. SpookySwap and SpiritSwap, though simpler in design, provide deep liquidity and continuous trading.
Security and Risk Considerations
KyberSwap’s contracts have undergone multiple third‑party audits (e.g., PeckShield, Quantstamp) and incorporate a governance pause mechanism that can halt swaps if a vulnerability is discovered.
However, the inactivity on Fantom may be a symptom of an unresolved bug or a strategic withdrawal. Users should:
- Inspect the Fantom block explorer for recent contract interactions.
- Check audit reports for the specific Elastic version (identified by contract address).
- Never deposit more than you’re willing to lose until the platform’s health is independently verified.
Who Might Still Find Value in KyberSwap Elastic (Fantom)?
Even with zero visible pairs, some users have niche reasons to monitor the protocol:
- Liquidity providers looking to earn KNC incentives once the pools reactivate.
- Developers building on top of KyberSwap’s SDK, which works across chains regardless of UI status.
- Arbitrageurs who track cross‑chain price differences; Elastic’s fee model may become advantageous if volume returns.
For everyday traders who just want to swap tokens quickly, the platform’s current downtime outweighs these speculative benefits.
Step‑by‑Step: How to Test the Elastic Contract on Fantom
- Install a Web3‑compatible wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet) and add the Fantom Opera network (RPC: https://rpc.ftm.tools).
- Visit the KyberSwap Elastic contract address on FtmScan (search for “KyberSwap Elastic”).
- Open the “Read Contract” tab and call the
getPoolInfomethod for a known token pair (e.g., USDC‑WFTM). - If the response returns non‑zero liquidity, the pool is still live; you can interact via a custom UI or script.
- To execute a swap, use the “Write Contract” tab, approving the token first, then calling
swapExactTokensForTokenswith your desired amount.
Always start with a tiny amount (e.g., 0.001WFTM) to confirm the transaction goes through before committing larger sums.
Future Outlook
KyberSwap’s multi‑chain ambition suggests that the Fantom Elastic version could be revived once the team resolves any technical hurdles. Their roadmap (as of Q22025) lists “full Elastic support on Fantom” as a medium‑term goal, alongside fee‑reduction upgrades on other chains.
Investors should watch the official KyberSwap Discord and Twitter for announcements. If a relaunch occurs, the platform’s existing KNC ecosystem and cross‑chain aggregator capabilities could give it a competitive edge over native Fantom DEXs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does KyberSwap Elastic on Fantom show 0 tokens?
The front‑end currently lists no pairs, which usually means the liquidity pools have been paused or the UI is offline. On‑chain data may still hold hidden liquidity, but without an active UI it appears empty.
Is it safe to provide liquidity on KyberSwap Elastic (Fantom) right now?
Only if you verify that the pool contracts are still active and not under a governance pause. Until the platform’s status is publicly confirmed, most users should treat liquidity provision as high‑risk.
How does KyberSwap’s Elastic fee model differ from standard AMM fees?
Elastic uses dynamic fee tiers that increase as pool utilization rises, aiming to keep slippage low for large orders. Traditional AMMs charge a flat % (e.g., 0.3%) regardless of trade size.
Can I trade on KyberSwap without KYC?
Yes. Being a permission‑less DEX, KyberSwap lets anyone connect a wallet and trade, no identity verification required.
What alternatives should I consider on Fantom?
SpookySwap and SpiritSwap are the most liquid and actively maintained Fantom DEXs. Both offer deep pools for popular tokens like USDC, WFTM, and DAI, with solid community support.
Stefano Benny
October 30, 2024 AT 08:39KyberSwap Elastic on Fantom is a textbook case of a promising aggregator falling into the black hole of inactivity. The Elastic engine, with its dynamic fee tiers and multi‑source liquidity routing, reads like a whitepaper dream. Yet the UI shows zero pairs, which in DeFi parlance signals either a pause button hit or a silent contract death. Developers love the on‑chain governance pause, but traders hate the lack of visible depth. Liquidity providers eye KNC farming rewards, but without a pool to stake, the incentives evaporate. From a technical standpoint, the smart contracts still bear audit stamps from PeckShield and Quantstamp. Those audit stamps, however, don’t guarantee that the contracts are currently funded. On‑chain explorers reveal no recent swap events, confirming a dormant state. If you query the getPoolInfo method for USDC‑WFTM, the response is a flat zero. This mirrors the classic mismatch between protocol ambition and operational reality. Meanwhile, competitors like SpookySwap hustle with $250M+ liquidity and daily volumes. The contrast is stark: Elastic promises low slippage via Elastic fees, but slippage is moot when there’s nothing to trade. Investors should treat the Fantom instance as high‑risk until the team broadcasts a relaunch roadmap. A diligent trader would verify contract balances before committing any capital. In short, the tech is solid, the audits are solid, but the market presence is currently non‑existent. 🚀
Jenae Lawler
October 30, 2024 AT 09:09One might ostensibly deem KyberSwap Elastic a triumph of decentralized engineering, yet its current inert state on Fantom belies any such lofty proclamation. The veneer of sophistication masks an unsettling vacuum of liquidity, rendering its ostensibly avant‑garde mechanisms impotent. While some apologists might invoke future roadmap promises, the present empirical data is unequivocally barren. In a landscape where capital seeks efficient conduits, a platform lacking active pairs is tantamount to a defunct exchange. Consequently, it would be prudent to divert one's assets toward venues demonstrably operational.
Prince Chaudhary
October 30, 2024 AT 09:39Hey folks, just a quick heads‑up: before you jump in, double‑check the contract state on FtmScan. Even if the UI looks empty, the contracts might still hold hidden liquidity. Test with a minuscule amount to confirm the swap executes. Stay safe and happy trading.
Courtney Winq-Microblading
October 30, 2024 AT 10:09It’s fascinating how a protocol can boast such intricate architecture yet sit idle, like a grand library with dust‑covered shelves. The Elastic model’s promise of dynamic fees feels poetic when the halls are empty. One wonders whether the silence is a strategic pause or an inadvertent neglect. In the grand tapestry of DeFi, every unused thread still informs the pattern.
katie littlewood
October 30, 2024 AT 10:39Building upon the previous reflection, it’s worth noting that the very ambition behind Elastic could serve as a catalyst once re‑activated. The multi‑chain vision, coupled with on‑chain governance, provides a robust scaffolding for future growth. Even in its dormant phase, the audited contracts furnish a foundation of trust that other platforms often lack. Should the team decide to resurrect the Fantom instance, liquidity providers stand to benefit from pre‑existing incentive structures. Moreover, the dynamic fee tiers could attract large‑scale traders seeking reduced slippage, thereby revitalizing the ecosystem. In summary, patience paired with vigilant monitoring may reward early adopters when activity resumes.
Chad Fraser
October 30, 2024 AT 11:09Yo, I get the hype around Elastic, but if there’s no action, why waste gas? Test the pools on testnet first, and if they’re dead, move on. Keep your capital flowing where the action is.
Jayne McCann
October 30, 2024 AT 11:39Looks like KyberSwap just ghosted Fantom. No pairs, no volume – pretty much a dead end.
Richard Herman
October 30, 2024 AT 12:09While the silence can be disheartening, it also offers a window for careful observation. A paused platform might be undergoing upgrades, so keeping an eye on official channels is wise. Patience can sometimes pay off when the service resumes.
Parker Dixon
October 30, 2024 AT 12:39🔍 Quick tip: use the "Read Contract" tab on FtmScan to verify pool balances before committing. If the getPoolInfo function returns non‑zero, you’ve got live liquidity. Otherwise, it’s safest to wait. Stay sharp! 🚀
Bobby Ferew
October 30, 2024 AT 13:09Honestly, it’s a bit frustrating watching a platform with all that hype just sit there empty. The audits sound great on paper, but without real usage, they feel hollow. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see if they ever dust it off.
celester Johnson
October 30, 2024 AT 13:39One could argue that the silence itself is an implicit statement about market confidence. When a protocol’s front‑end goes dark, it invites speculation about underlying vulnerabilities. Yet the presence of thorough audits suggests a foundation of security, albeit unused. Thus, the paradox remains: a secure yet dormant system.
Investors must weigh the abstract safety against the concrete absence of activity.
John Kinh
October 30, 2024 AT 14:09Zero pairs, zero action.
Mark Camden
October 30, 2024 AT 14:39From a fiduciary standpoint, allocating capital to an inert protocol contravenes prudent risk management principles. The audited smart contracts provide a veneer of security, yet the lack of on‑chain activity indicates a systemic deficiency. One must consider opportunity cost; funds locked in a dormant pool generate no yield. Moreover, the absence of active governance proposals suggests stagnation. In light of these factors, diversifying into actively trading DEXs aligns better with long‑term portfolio health.
Evie View
October 30, 2024 AT 15:09It’s maddening to watch a platform sit on its laurels while the rest of the ecosystem thrives. The promise of dynamic fees is meaningless without actual trades. If they don’t revive soon, we’ll just label them another dead project.
Sidharth Praveen
October 30, 2024 AT 15:39Don’t let the inactivity deter you completely; it could be a temporary pause for upgrades. Keep an eye on the official Discord for any announcements about relaunch. If they announce a comeback, early participants could reap significant rewards. Until then, allocate only a modest amount you’re willing to risk.
Sophie Sturdevant
October 30, 2024 AT 16:09Listen, you can’t just sit on the sidelines forever. If KyberSwap wants to stay relevant, they need to fire up those pools and start delivering KNC yields. The community expects real liquidity, not just audit paperwork. Get the devs to push the launch button and show some beta activity. Otherwise, you’re just another ghost platform.
Nathan Blades
October 30, 2024 AT 16:39When you contemplate the grand design of Elastic, you must appreciate the philosophical underpinnings of dynamic fee allocation. It seeks to harmonize market impact with user experience, a noble pursuit indeed. Yet the silence on Fantom is a stark reminder that theory without implementation is barren. If the gears start turning again, we might witness a renaissance of elastic liquidity. Until then, the saga remains an unfinished chapter.
Somesh Nikam
October 30, 2024 AT 17:09For clarity, the contract’s getPoolInfo method currently returns zero for all queried pairs. This factual state indicates that no liquidity is active at present. Operators should verify contract balance fields before announcing a relaunch. 📊