Nigeria Crypto Policy Timeline
How Nigeria's Crypto Rules Evolved
Explore key milestones in Nigeria's journey from crypto ban to regulation.
2017: First CBN Warning
CBN issued circular advising banks not to deal with crypto services. No outright ban but clear warning about risks.
Impact: Early crypto users moved to peer-to-peer platforms
February 5, 2021: Strict Ban
CBN ordered banks to close accounts of crypto businesses and stop processing crypto transactions.
Impact: P2P trading exploded as users switched to WhatsApp and mobile money
September 2020: SEC Steps In
SEC declared crypto tokens acting as securities would be regulated under Investment and Securities Act.
Impact: Created regulatory framework for security-like assets
December 2023: VASP Guidelines
CBN introduced Virtual Asset Service Provider guidelines allowing licensed crypto firms to operate.
Impact: Official end of ban; banks could hold accounts for licensed VASPs
2025: Digital Assets as Securities
Passed Investments and Securities Act 2025 recognizing digital assets as securities under SEC regulation.
Impact: Full regulatory framework; unlicensed exchanges made illegal
Back in 2021, if you were caught trading Bitcoin in Nigeria using a bank account, your account could be frozen overnight. No warning. No appeal. Just gone. That was the reality under the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) strict ban on cryptocurrency transactions. But by 2025, the same bank that once shut down crypto accounts now licenses crypto firms and lets banks work with them. This isn’t just a policy tweak-it’s a full reversal. And it tells you everything about how governments are learning to deal with decentralized money.
The 2017 Warning: Not a Ban, But a Red Flag
The CBN first spoke up about cryptocurrency in January 2017 with a circular to all banks. It didn’t say crypto was illegal. It didn’t say you couldn’t own it. But it told banks: don’t touch it. No accounts for crypto exchanges. No transfers for Bitcoin purchases. No processing payments for digital asset platforms. The goal? To stop money laundering and protect the banking system from unregulated risks. At the time, Nigeria’s crypto scene was tiny. A few early adopters, mostly tech-savvy students and freelancers sending remittances. But the CBN’s move sent a chill through the industry. Banks started closing accounts of people who traded crypto-even if they weren’t running exchanges. People didn’t stop trading. They just moved underground.The 2021 Crackdown: The Real Ban
On February 5, 2021, the CBN went further. It issued a letter to all deposit money banks, microfinance institutions, and financial intermediaries. It was clear: no dealing in crypto. No facilitating payments. No holding accounts for crypto businesses. This wasn’t a suggestion. It was an order. And it had teeth. Banks started shutting down thousands of accounts linked to crypto trading. Companies like Binance and OKX saw their Nigerian customers suddenly cut off. But here’s the twist: people didn’t stop trading. They just switched to peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms. Instead of using banks, Nigerians bought Bitcoin directly from other people using mobile money apps, cash deposits, and even WhatsApp. P2P trading exploded. Nigeria became one of the top countries in the world for P2P crypto volume. Why? Because when the government blocks the highway, people build dirt roads. And in Nigeria, those dirt roads ran through WhatsApp groups and local marketplaces. Crypto became a lifeline during the #EndSARS protests in 2020. When the government froze activist bank accounts, crypto donations kept the movement alive. That’s when the CBN realized: you can’t stop what people can’t see.The SEC Steps In: A Parallel Path
While the CBN was shutting doors, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was opening windows. In September 2020, the SEC declared that any digital asset that acted like a security-like a token promising returns or profit-sharing-would be regulated under the Investments and Securities Act. This was huge. It meant crypto wasn’t just gambling or tech hype. Some tokens were financial instruments. The SEC and CBN formed a joint committee to figure out how to handle crypto. The CBN wanted control over banks. The SEC wanted to regulate investment products. Neither wanted chaos. But neither had a clear plan-until 2023.
The 2023 Pivot: Licensing, Not Banning
In December 2023, everything changed. The CBN dropped the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) Guidelines. For the first time, it said: banks can open accounts for crypto firms-if they’re licensed by the SEC. This was the official end of the ban. Not because crypto was safe. Not because the CBN suddenly loved Bitcoin. But because the ban had failed. People were still trading. Money was still moving. And the government was losing control-not because of hackers, but because of its own inflexibility. The new rules were strict. Crypto companies had to register with the SEC. They had to do full KYC (know your customer). They had to report all transactions. They had to prove they weren’t laundering money. The SEC became the gatekeeper. The CBN became the enabler.The 2025 Law: Crypto as a Security
By 2025, Nigeria passed the Investments and Securities Act 2025. This law formally recognized digital assets as securities. It gave the SEC full authority to license, audit, and penalize crypto firms. It also made it illegal to operate a crypto exchange without a license. This wasn’t just about regulation. It was about legitimacy. Nigeria was trying to get off the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) Gray List. The FATF had flagged Nigeria for weak anti-money laundering controls. Crypto was a big reason why. By bringing crypto into the formal system, Nigeria showed it could manage risk-even with decentralized tech.What Happened to the Big Exchanges?
During the ban, some big players left. OKX pulled out in July 2024, telling customers to withdraw funds because of "recent changes in local laws." Binance removed the naira from its trading pairs. Rumors swirled that two Binance executives were detained over untraceable funds. But here’s the irony: those same companies are now back. Not as outsiders. Not as rule-breakers. As licensed VASPs. They’re applying for SEC licenses. They’re setting up local offices. They’re hiring Nigerian compliance officers. The market didn’t die-it adapted.
Why the Change? The Real Reason
The CBN didn’t change its mind because it believed in crypto. It changed because it had no choice. Nigeria’s youth are among the most crypto-literate in the world. Over 30% of adults have traded or owned crypto. The country’s remittance market is worth over $20 billion a year. Much of it flows through crypto because traditional channels are slow and expensive. The government also realized it was losing tax revenue. When crypto trades happen off the books, no one pays tax. When they’re licensed and tracked, they can be taxed. And then there’s the dollar. Nigeria’s currency has been under pressure. The government blamed crypto traders for driving up demand for dollars. But the truth? The real problem was oil prices and poor fiscal policy. Crypto was just the scapegoat.Current Rules: What You Need to Know in 2025
If you want to trade crypto in Nigeria today, here’s what matters:- You can’t trade through an unlicensed exchange. The SEC has published a list of approved VASPs.
- Your bank can now legally hold your crypto business account-if the firm is licensed.
- You must complete KYC. No anonymous trading.
- All transactions over 500,000 naira must be reported to the Financial Intelligence Unit.
- Stablecoins like USDT are allowed-but only if issued by licensed entities.
Nelia Mcquiston
November 30, 2025 AT 18:54The shift from prohibition to regulation isn't just policy-it's a recognition that control is an illusion when people have access to technology and desperation. The CBN didn't change its mind. It realized it was fighting the tide with a paper towel.
Human behavior doesn't obey decrees. It finds paths. Nigeria didn't defeat crypto. It surrendered gracefully and turned surrender into strategy.
This is what real governance looks like: not domination, but adaptation.